ขณะนี้อยู่ระหว่างปรับปรุง Theme ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก

ขนาดอักษร

Voting System for the Selection of the Faculty Dean
Voting System for the Selection of the Faculty Dean

Even though the Regulation of Chiang Mai University on the Selection of Faculty Dean, B.E. 2545 (2002) did not specifically specify rules on the selection of
the Dean and the dean selection process was administrative proceedings which must be conducted pursuant to Administrative Procedure Act, B.E. 2539 (1996), the selection of the Dean was not a resolution under Section 82 paragraph one of the said Act.
It was a voting which placed importance on the number of votes obtained; the winning candidate was not required to win by a majority. When the Plaintiff obtained the most votes in the first round of voting, Defendant no.2 should have nominated the Plaintiff to Defendant no.1 for appointment as the Dean of Faculty of Humanities. Instead, Defendant no.2 rejected the result of the first voting, conducted the revote, and nominated Assoc. Prof. R to Defendant no.1 for appointment as the Dean. Therefore, the selection process was unlawful, and the order appointing Assoc. Prof. R to the position of the Dean of Faculty of Humanities which was made according to the result of such process was also unlawful. 




เอกสารประกอบ



ปรับปรุงข้อมูลเมื่อ : 6 พ.ย. 2561, 14:20 น. | กลับขึ้นด้านบน |