ขณะนี้อยู่ระหว่างปรับปรุง Theme ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก

ขนาดอักษร ก ก ก

  • หน้าแรก
  • > วิชาการ
  • > สรุปคำแปลวินิจฉัยของศาลปกครอง
สรุปคำแปลวินิจฉัยของศาลปกครอง
สรุปคำแปลวินิจฉัยของศาลปกครอง

ปรับปรุงเมื่อ 6 มี.ค. 2562, 11:22น.

Right to claim for housing rent of government official in case of relocation during the investigation of disciplinary proceedings

Royal Decree Housing Rent of Government Official B.E. 2547 (2004) and Regulation of Ministry of Finance on Criteria and Procedures regarding Withdrawal of Housing Rent of Government Agency, B.E. 2549 (2006) do not provide the specific time period for consideration of housing rent application, the government agency then has the duty to consider the application within reasonable time and by the case–by-case basis. The Plaintiff exercises the right to apply for housing rent due to the Order of relocation to perform official duties, at another place for the interest of fact inquiry during investigation process, resulting in the wrongfully performing official duty and suspicious behaviour to malfeasance made by the Plaintiff. Therefore, government agency has to make the consideration of the competent authority for the approval of housing rent application and the withdrawal from the budget owner. Moreover, the Plaintiff exercised the right to claim for the housing rent almost three years retroactively which could not be considered as a general case. This leading to the inquiry before the approval in order to ensure that the consideration of the housing rent is in a discreet and correct manner. Therefore, the consideration and approval of the housing rent application of the competent authority in the period of 339 days is a reasonable period of time and not a wrongful act according to the Section 420 of the Civil and Commercial Code.

อ่าน 17   |  ดูรายละเอียดบทความ
ปรับปรุงเมื่อ 8 ก.พ. 2562, 09:15น.

Legal Status of an Order of the Royal Thai Police Issued under Immigration Act

Order of the Royal Thai Police on Rules and Conditions for the Determination of Requests for Temporary Stay in the Kingdom, dated 8th September B.E. 2549 (2006) was applied only to the performance of duty of police officers; it did not have general application. The said Order of the Royal Thai Police was thus an internal administrative measure, not a rule. Clause 7 (7.24) of the Order of the Royal Thai Police, dated 8th September B.E. 2549 (2006) stipulated that a request for temporary stay in the case of receiving medical treatment, attending rehabilitation, or taking care of a patient shall be accompanied by a letter of confirmation and request for a temporary stay issued by a physician of the hospital providing said medical treatment. An opinion from doctor was crucial in order for the competent official to determine whether the illness was an impediment to travel. Moreover, the Order of the Royal Thai Police, dated 8th September B.E. 2549 (2006) was issued under Section 35 of Immigration Act, B.E. 2522 (1979), of which the purpose was to maintain national security and public order. To this end, rules and conditions in granting permission for temporary stay must be stringent. It was thus justified to demand that a letter of confirmation and request for temporary stay needed to be issued by physicians working in hospitals, not in clinics, so as to ensure the accuracy and truthfulness of the letter. Consequently, Order of the Royal Thai Police on Rules and Conditions for the Determination of Requests for Temporary Stay in the Kingdom, dated 8th September B.E. 2549 (2006) was lawful.

อ่าน 45   |  ดูรายละเอียดบทความ
ปรับปรุงเมื่อ 7 ม.ค. 2562, 09:19น.

The Inconsistency of Prices in the Quotation of Successful Bidder

When a quotation specified the price in numbers inconsistently with the price in words, and an estimated cost indicated in attached documents was equal to the quoted price in numbers, it was deemed that the prices in numbers and in words were at variance pursuant to Clause 4.2 of the Price Inquiry Document, dated 19th January B.E. 2553 (2010). The Price Inquiry Envelope-Opening Committee had the discretion to consider such quotation by taking the price written in words as the price that the bidder intended to quote. The difference between the prices written in numbers and in words did not cause any advantage or disadvantage to other bidders, since the words will prevail over the numbers. Moreover, the documents indicating the construction cost estimate were only attachments to the quotation; the bidder was not obliged to quote the price according to the cost estimate. Therefore, it was lawful for the Price Inquiry Envelope-Opening Committee to consider the above-mentioned quotation and choose the bidder who submitted that quotation as the successful bidder.

อ่าน 117   |  ดูรายละเอียดบทความ
ปรับปรุงเมื่อ 6 ธ.ค. 2561, 15:00น.

The above general standard for the acceptance inspection should have been stipulated as a specific condition in the contract

When the administrative party required the seller to test the efficiency of the wheel loader at the actual construction site and to dispatch experts to advise and participate in the testing, it is considered that such inspection of the wheel loader is above the general standard for the inspection and acceptance whereby the general functions are tested upon delivery. If the administrative party wishes to do so, it should have stipulated such specific condition in the contract. Since the requirement is not a condition in the contract, the non-compliance may not be claimed against the seller as a termination cause. Therefore, the notice to terminate the contract is unlawful. Nevertheless, when the seller repossessed the wheel loader and the administrative party did not maintain it for use, the parties shall restore the other to the former condition under Section 391 of the Civil and Commercial Code. As a result, the seller may not be required to comply with the contract by demanding for the payment for the wheel loader whereas the seller suffers from the damage, damages shall be stipulated.

อ่าน 168   |  ดูรายละเอียดบทความ
ปรับปรุงเมื่อ 6 พ.ย. 2561, 14:19น.

Voting System for the Selection of the Faculty Dean

Even though the Regulation of Chiang Mai University on the Selection of Faculty Dean, B.E. 2545 (2002) did not specifically specify rules on the selection of the Dean and the dean selection process was administrative proceedings which must be conducted pursuant to Administrative Procedure Act, B.E. 2539 (1996), the selection of the Dean was not a resolution under Section 82 paragraph one of the said Act. It was a voting which placed importance on the number of votes obtained; the winning candidate was not required to win by a majority. When the Plaintiff obtained the most votes in the first round of voting, Defendant no.2 should have nominated the Plaintiff to Defendant no.1 for appointment as the Dean of Faculty of Humanities. Instead, Defendant no.2 rejected the result of the first voting, conducted the revote, and nominated Assoc. Prof. R to Defendant no.1 for appointment as the Dean. Therefore, the selection process was unlawful, and the order appointing Assoc. Prof. R to the position of the Dean of Faculty of Humanities which was made according to the result of such process was also unlawful.

อ่าน 208   |  ดูรายละเอียดบทความ
ปรับปรุงเมื่อ 6 พ.ย. 2561, 14:21น.

To Remove Chief Executive of Subdistrict Administrative Organization from Office without Waiting for the Result of the National Anti-Corruption Commission’s Investigation

In case where Chief Executive of Subdistrict Administrative Organization (SAO) is accused of having inappropriate behavior and exhibiting a sign of malfeasance in performing official duties, District Chief has the power to conduct an inquiry and remove the Chief Executive of SAO from office pursuant to Sections 58/1 and 64 paragraph one (4) of Subdistrict Council and Subdistrict Administrative Organization Act, B.E. 2537 (1994). The District Chief may do so without having to wait for the result of the National Anti-Corruption Commission’s investigation conducted under Sections 19 and 66 of Organic Act on Anti-Corruption, B.E. 2542 (1999). When it was apparent that the Chief Executive of SAO had malfeasant behavior according to Section 58/1 (3) of Subdistrict Council and Subdistrict Administrative Organization Act, B.E. 2537 (1994), and the District Chief issued an order removing the Chief Executive of SAO from office pursuant to Section 64 paragraph one (4) of the said Act; such order was lawful.

อ่าน 190   |  ดูรายละเอียดบทความ
ปรับปรุงเมื่อ 3 ก.ย. 2561, 15:55น.

Liability of a Municipality for a Wrongful Act Committed by Private Entities that were Hired for the Construction of Utility Systems

Municipality has power and duties to provide a drainage system and a wastewater treatment system within the area of municipality pursuant to Section 56 of Municipalities Act, B.E. 2496 (1953). By hiring private entities to do so, the municipality entrusted such power and duties to private entities according to Section 22 of Act Determining Plan and Procedures in Decentralizations to the Local Administrative Organization, B.E. 2542 (1999). Since the private entities were professional construction service providers and there was a consulting firm supervising the project, they must perform services with great care in accordance with professional ethics by using any measures to prevent and avoid causing damage to surrounding properties. When the private entities failed to exercise such care resulting in damage to a third party’s building, the Municipality as an administrative agency that delegated its power and duties to that private entities shall be liable for the consequence of such wrongful act.

อ่าน 225   |  ดูรายละเอียดบทความ
ปรับปรุงเมื่อ 1 ส.ค. 2561, 13:25น.

The revocation of Notification of Department of Land Transport in relation to the permission of the buses to use only one passenger terminal

The Letter on Announcement to inform the Chief Officer of the Khon Kaen Office of Provincial Land Transport to implement the Notification of the Department of Land Transport is not an administrative order to affect the status of the rights or duties of a person. However, the Notification itself, dated 21st August B.E.2558 (2015), on Buses to Use only Khon Kaen Bus Terminal 3, is a general administrative order having direct effect on the bus operators. The Plaintiffs reside in Khon Kaen and earn their living as merchants or being occasional laborers. They frequently take the bus from Khon Kaen bus terminal 1 and transfer at other terminals to travel to other districts of Khon kaen province. In addition, they continually take the bus for their daily work and to return to their hometowns monthly. Therefore, the Plaintiffs are customers of such bus lines and can also be considered as persons who are aggrieved or injured or who may inevitably be aggrieved or injured by such disputed Notification and shall have the right to file a case with the Administrative Court under Section 42 Paragraph one of Act on Establishment of the Administrative Courts and the Administrative Court Procedure, B.E. 2542 (1999)

อ่าน 293   |  ดูรายละเอียดบทความ
ปรับปรุงเมื่อ 3 ก.ค. 2561, 13:47น.

Cancellation the price inquiry in case of the Committee changes the place of price inquiry envelope opening without prior notice to bidders

The change in place of price inquiry envelope opening by the Price Inquiry Envelope-Opening Committee without notifying all bidders and posting a public notice is the Committee performed the process without opening sealed price quotation and reading publicly the quoted prices and list of submitted documents of all bidders on the specific place as listed in Notification on the Price Inquiry of Purchasing of Construction Material. Such act is in violation of Section 35(1) of the Regulations of the Ministry of the Interior on Procurement of Local Administration Agency, B.E. 2535 (1992), and is not performed by openness, transparent and giving opportunity to have fair price competition under Section 10(ter) paragraph 1, of the aforementioned Regulations. Even though a change in place was a necessity, changing the place for price inquiry envelope opening without prior notice to all relevant persons could cause damage to the state agency. Moreover, it cannot be considered as internal administration of the Committee to enable the price inquiry envelope opening. The issuance of an order to cancel the price inquiry of state agency in case of the Committee changes the place of price inquiry envelope opening without prior notice to bidders is a lawful act.

อ่าน 270   |  ดูรายละเอียดบทความ
ปรับปรุงเมื่อ 1 มิ.ย. 2561, 15:28น.

Compensation in case of the state agency rejected the qualified candidates to sign employment contracts

When issuing a Notification on admission and examination for the selection of individuals for appointment as government officials in situations where a state agency has not yet been allocated its budget according to the Act on Budgets for Annual Expenditures, and there are no existing circumstances to indicate beyond any doubt that the state agency will receive its budget, such agency has the obligation to issue the Notification in such a way as to make clear that any individuals selected will be called to report to the agency to sign an employment contract only when the budget has been allocated, or to use any other wording to the same effect. When the state agency issued a Notification on Admission and Examination for the Selection of Individuals for Appointment as Government Officials, specifying the exact date on which individuals selected would be called to report to the agency to sign employment contracts, even though the agency had not yet received its budget, and there were no existing circumstances to indicate whether the budget would be allocated or not, the issuing of the Notification in that manner by the agency would be considered as an action carried out negligently. And when the state agency rejected the individuals who were selected to come in to sign employment contracts, as stated in the Notification, and such failure caused damage to the individuals because they had resigned from their old jobs to prepare themselves for new jobs, such failure would be considered as a tort, according to Section 420 of the Civil and Commercial Code.

อ่าน 319   |  ดูรายละเอียดบทความ

รายการข้อมูลทั้งหมด 54 รายการ แสดง : รายการต่อหน้า
  •  
  •  
  • หน้าที่ 1/6
  •  

| กลับขึ้นด้านบน |

เขตอำนาจศาลปกครองเขตอำนาจศาลปกครอง

ศาลปกครอง

สืบค้นข้อมูล

สำนักงานศาลปกครอง

ประชาสัมพันธ์

วิชาการ